Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 4, 2011No. SC 91498PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.
Robert J. Simpson (Husband) appeals the dismissal of his motion to terminate maintenance by the trial court. Husband claims that the trial court erred in dismissing his motion because the statutory presumption created by § 452.370, RSMo 2000, that maintenance terminates upon remarriage, was not overcome by a written agreement between him and Rowena A. Simpson (Wife). This Court has jurisdic tion over this appeal under article V, section 10, of the Missouri Constitution, because it granted transfer after opinion by the court of appeals. Judgment affirmed.
Facts
In 1981,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Goerlitz v. City of MaryvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Cates v. CatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Glenn v. SniderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Reeves v. ReevesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landewee v. LandeweeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- State ex rel. Hawley v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- Baker v. Century Fin. Grp., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- In the matter of the petition of Missouri-American Water Company for approval to change its infrastructure system replacement surcharge (ISRS), Missouri Public Service Commission v. Office of Public CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kristen L. Main v. Donet C. Main, and Ethan Main, Intervenor.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.