Legal Opinion

FirstEnergy Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-0923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In 1999 Am.Sub.S.B. No. 3 (“S.B. 3”), the General Assembly adopted a comprehensive statutory scheme to facilitate and encourage competition in Ohio’s retail electric market. The provisions of S.B. 3 relevant to this decision are contained in newly enacted R.C. Chapter 4928. R.C. 4928.31 requires each electric utility that supplies retail electric service to file with the appellee, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO” or “commission”), a transition plan for providing competitive electric service in Ohio.

{¶ 2} In December 1999, appellant FirstEnergy Corporation, on behalf of its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jonas v. Swetland Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Shopping Centers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FirstEnergy Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API