FirstEnergy Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} In 1999 Am.Sub.S.B. No. 3 (“S.B. 3”), the General Assembly adopted a comprehensive statutory scheme to facilitate and encourage competition in Ohio’s retail electric market. The provisions of S.B. 3 relevant to this decision are contained in newly enacted R.C. Chapter 4928. R.C. 4928.31 requires each electric utility that supplies retail electric service to file with the appellee, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO” or “commission”), a transition plan for providing competitive electric service in Ohio.
{¶ 2} In December 1999, appellant FirstEnergy Corporation, on behalf of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Jonas v. Swetland Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
- Shopping Centers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by1 opinion
- FirstEnergy Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002