Legal Opinion

Federal Glass Co. v. Loshin

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 14, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 4357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This is an action for unfair competition wherein the plaintiff, an Ohio glassware manufacturer, seeks to enjoin the defendants, proprietors of a Danbury, Connecticut company specializing in plate glass installation, from using its corporate name, alleging that the defendants are obtaining the benefit of the plaintiff’s reputation and causing confusion to the public. The case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed with supporting affidavits. Defendants have also filed affidavits in opposition to said motion.

Plaintiff Federal Glass Company is an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Standard Oil Co. of New Mexico, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  5. Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Glass Company v. Samuel LoshinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. The Federal Glass Company v. Samuel Loshin and Nathan LoshinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Hot Shoppe, IncorporatedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1962
  4. Eye Associates, P.C. v. Connecticut Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
  5. Federal Glass Company v. Samuel LoshinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API