Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Nevins-Petrillo Warehouse & Distribution Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1983No. 79 Civ. 2588 (HFW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
HENRY F. WERKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) commenced this action under the Interstate Commerce Act to recover demur-rage and related transportation charges from defendant Nevins-Petrillo Warehouse & Distribution Systems, Inc. (Nevins-Petril-lo). Nevins-Petrillo is a New York corporation engaged in the business of unloading, warehousing and distributing freight moved by rail. During the period relevant to this action, Nevins-Petrillo owned and operated a warehouse which was adjacent to Conrail’s Harlem River/Oak Point railroad yards in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. Golden Triangle Wholesale Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. v. S.S. Cap Castillo, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- In re Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States Steel Corp. v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. City of PensacolaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- Bank of Crete, S.A. v. KoskotasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990