Legal Opinion

Heligman v. Otto

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1987No. Docket 87063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, P.J.

Defendants,' Richard Otto, doing business as Riverland Equities, and Dennis M. Hayes, appeal by leave granted from a circuit court order affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment to plaintiff, Richard Heligman. The district court found that Otto and Hayes had failed to register under the Uniform Securities Act, MCL 451.501 et seq.; MSA 19.776(101) et seq., as a securities broker-dealer and a securities agent, respectively, as required by MCL 451.601; MSA 19.776(201), and were therefore liable to plaintiff under MCL 451.810(a); MSA 19.776 (410)(a) for certain losses incurred in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pontiac School District v. Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pransky v. Falcon Group, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Bracy v. Winchester Metals Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API