Legal Opinion
Callaway Golf Co. v. Dunlop Slazenger Group Americas, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 13, 2004No. CIV.A. 01-669-KAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Presently before me is a motion by Callaway Golf Company (“Callaway”) for partial summary judgment on the misappropriation of trade secrets counterclaim 1 asserted by Dunlop Slazenger Group Americas, Inc. d/b/a Maxfli (“Dunlop”). (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 310; the “Motion”). Specifically, Callaway seeks summary judgment on Dunlop’s allegation that a former Dunlop polyurethane chemist, Pi-jush Dewanjee (“Dewanjee”), who went to work for Callaway, misappropriated Dun-lop’s polyurethane golf ball technology to develop golf balls for Callaway. 2…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Appalachian Insurance Company v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- American Can Company v. Ishwar Mansukhani, D/B/A Brand Associates, and Ruth Brand, D/B/A Brand Associates, and Brand M, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Labyrinth, Inc. v. Stephen A. UrichCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
- Labyrinth, Inc. v. Stephen A. UrichCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024