Legal Opinion

People v. Griffith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2004No. 95218PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused himself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

FITZGERALD, J., took no part.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vill v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. STATE EX REL. NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. v. Elkhart Superior Court, Room OneIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Crane v. Admiral Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API