Legal Opinion

Fillinger v. Conley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1904No. 20,435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Vermillion Circuit Court; Joseph M. Babb, Special Judge. Claim by Hugh H. Conley and Paul H. Conley against John B. Fillinger, as administrator with the will annexed of George P. Daly, deceased, for legal services. From a judgment for plaintiffs for $500, the defendant appeals. Transferred from the Appellate Court under § 1337uBurns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

This action is based on a claim which was filed by appellees against the estate, of George B. Daly, deceased, to recover the reasonable value of their services as attorneys, rendered at the request of the nominated executor of the will of said decedent, in representing said executor as a party defendant to a proceeding instituted by the heir at law to resist the probate of said will.

Appellant, by proper assignments of error, draws in question the correctness of certain conclusions of law in favor of appellees, entered upon special findings of fact.

In the brief filed on behalf of appellant it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SoulardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Henderson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. Phillips' ex'r v. Phillips' adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  4. Lassiter v. TravisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lucas v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. McColleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Moll v. GoedekeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Doan v. HerodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. In re Hegarty's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Voyles v. HindsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API