Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Pommier
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 20, 1985No. 2774PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
This appeal1 arises out of the trial court’s judgment rendered upon a jury verdict for the defendants, directed by the court. In addition, the plaintiff appeals several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings. We find error in part.
On September 5,1974, the plaintiff, Axel Campbell, visited the office of the defendant Charles Pommier2 for a dental checkup. During the course of his visit, Campbell underwent four bite wing x-rays administered *31by the defendant Elaine Byron, Pommier’s dental hygienist. There is a dispute over precisely what thereafter occurred. Campbell’s complaint alleges, in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. McCallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shegog v. ZabreckyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Perez v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Somma v. GraceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Frank Perrotti & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Bozelko v. PapastavrosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.