Legal Opinion
Havemeyer Textile v. Federal Insurance Administrator
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1983No. CV-82-2026PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Havemeyer Textile, commenced this action alleging the defendants issued a federal crime insurance policy insuring plaintiff against burglary, that plaintiff sustained burglary losses at its business premises in Brooklyn on September 8 and October 5, 1981, that plaintiff has complied with the policy claim requirements, and that defendants have refused to adjust plaintiff’s losses and have breached the insurance contract. Defendants move for an order pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure granting them summary judgment.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diamond v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Bolton v. GiuffridaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Cohen v. Federal Insurance AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Fine Wear Manufacturing Co. v. GiuffridaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Sherman v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996