Legal Opinion

State v. Mares

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 1, 1989No. 88-1530-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Juan Mares appeals from a judgment convicting him of four counts of second-degree sexual assault, contrary to sec. 940.225(2)(e), Stats. He contends that the trial court erroneously admitted substantive evidence of prior consistent statements made by two of the state’s witnesses. Mares also argues that the trial court improperly allowed the state to inquire into concerns of the victim’s sisters because of Mares’ actions intruding on their privacy. Finally, when the court precluded any further testimony on this subject, Mares argues that the prosecutor committed misconduct by flouting the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GomazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. GaviganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. State v. BaudhuinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. State v. DamonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. State v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. State v. JoseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. State v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API