Legal Opinion
Scofield Engineering Co. v. City of Danville
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 23, 1940No. 3750PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
This case comes before me on defendant’s motion for a judgment on plaintiff’s amended complaint and defendant’s answer thereto, under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Defendant also filed a counterclaim and plaintiff replied thereto, denying the allegations thereof.
The facts, as shown by the pleadings, briefly are:
In the spring of 1933, the City of Dan-ville desired to construct a hydro-electric power plant at the Pinnacles of the Dan in Patrick County, Virginia, to be operated by the municipality for the purpose…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Harlingen Independent School Dist. v. PageTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- City of Bristol v. Dominion National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Royer v. Board of County SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scofield Engineering Co. v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942