Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Aurora Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

This is a consolidation of two actions upon policies of insurance against loss by fire. One policy, for $1,500, was issued by the Aurora Fire and Marine Insurance Com*60pany, of Cincinnati, and the other, for $2,500, was issued by the Home Insurance Company, of Columbus, Ohio, both being upon a stock of goods owned by the plaintiffs, who were merchants residing in Dead wood, Dakota. Ity stipulation of counsel the two causes were heard by the same jury, upon the same testimony, and one transcript brings them both before this court, on appeal. Plaintiffs recovered the full amounts claimed, on both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . the Atlantic Fire and Marine Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Schomer v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Mellen v. . the Hamilton Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Young & Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. American Insurance v. LuttrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. German-American Insurance v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. Trice v. Georgia Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Hamilton v. Aurora Fire & Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Rowell v. Fireman's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API