Legal Opinion

Liddell ex rel. Liddell v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1994No. 92-2510PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

In 1980 this court in an en banc opinion ordered that existing magnet and specialty schools in the St. Louis School District be maintained and that additional magnet schools be established.1 In 1982 we became more precise and required that additional magnet schools be established at the State’s expense within the city.2

Ten years ago this court in an en banc opinion established an enrollment goal of 14,-000 students for the magnet schools in the St. Louis School District.3 We subsequently stated that this goal was to be achieved no later than the 1989-90 school…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liddell v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Liddell v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
  4. Liddell v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liddell v. Board Of Education Of The City Of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API