United States v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
David L. Harris appeals his sentence following his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We review de novo the district court’s determination that Harris qualified as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. United States v. Crawford, 520 F.3d 1072, 1077 (9th Cir.2008). We affirm.
Harris’s Nevada convictions for robbery and attempted robbery categorically qualify as crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. Like the California statute we analyzed in United States v. Becerril-Lopez, 541 F.3d 881, 892 (9th Cir.2008), any conduct under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 200.380 that did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. MosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- United States v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Velasquez-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. EdlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Tavares ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Brandon Montiel-CortesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Rogelio Sanchez MolinarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.