Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2009No. 08-10370PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

David L. Harris appeals his sentence following his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We review de novo the district court’s determination that Harris qualified as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. United States v. Crawford, 520 F.3d 1072, 1077 (9th Cir.2008). We affirm.

Harris’s Nevada convictions for robbery and attempted robbery categorically qualify as crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. Like the California statute we analyzed in United States v. Becerril-Lopez, 541 F.3d 881, 892 (9th Cir.2008), any conduct under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 200.380 that did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. People v. MosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. United States v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Velasquez-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. EdlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Tavares ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Brandon Montiel-CortesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Rogelio Sanchez MolinarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API