Legal Opinion

Louisville Nashville Rr. Company v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 10, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

On March 31, 1926, the appellee and plaintiff below, John B. Grant, was serving the appellant and defendant below, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, as head brakeman on one of its freight trains going east from Louisville, and his position while the train was running was in the cab of the engine on a seat next to the window, through which he could maintain' a lookout ahead. Besides the glass window there was an equipment attached thereto which is referred to in this record as the windstorm shield, and which was designed to protect the one…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Fee's Administratrix v. Mahan-Ellison Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. L N. R. R. Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Reverman's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API