Legal Opinion

In re Barker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 28, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of the determination of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) to treat as a presentment, the recommendation of the District XIV Ethics Committee for Mercer County (the Ethics Committee) that respondent be privately reprimanded. The Disciplinary Review Board unanimously agreed with the Ethics Committee’s findings of unethical conduct but was unable to agree on the appropriate discipline. A majority of the DRB recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months, one member of the DRB recommended that respondent be suspended from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Matter of HennessySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Matter of FucetolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API