Mejia-Ramos v. USA-2255
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ERIC ANTONIO MEJIA-RAMOS, * Petitioner, * v. * Crim. No. DLB-13-496 (Civ. No. DLB-21-339) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * Respondent. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Eric Antonio Mejia-Ramos (“Mejia”) moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2255
on the ground that his trial and appellate counsel was unconstitutionally ineffective. ECF 717. The United States opposes the motion. ECF 716. No hearing is necessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b); Rule 8(a), Rules Governing § 2255 Cases in the U.S. Dist. Cts.; Loc. R.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.