Legal Opinion

Mejia-Ramos v. USA-2255

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 11, 2024No. 8:21-cv-00339Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ERIC ANTONIO MEJIA-RAMOS, * Petitioner, * v. * Crim. No. DLB-13-496 (Civ. No. DLB-21-339) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * Respondent. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Eric Antonio Mejia-Ramos (“Mejia”) moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

on the ground that his trial and appellate counsel was unconstitutionally ineffective. ECF 717. The United States opposes the motion. ECF 716. No hearing is necessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b); Rule 8(a), Rules Governing § 2255 Cases in the U.S. Dist. Cts.; Loc. R.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API