Ex parte Carroll
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
This is a postconviction habeas corpus application brought pursuant to and in compliance with Article 11.07, § 2, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant contends the felony information1 underlying his conviction for escape is fundamentally defective.
Omitting the formal portions, that pleading alleged applicant did,
*438“... intentionally and knowingly escape from his confinement in Harris County Detention Center, after having been charged with and confined for the offense of theft... ,”2
Y.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 38.07(a) proscribes the offense of escape as follows in relevant part:
“A person ...…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ex Parte McCurdyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex Parte WallingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ex Parte HopsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Harrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Luciano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ex Parte HopsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.