Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 16, 1985No. 04-84-00217-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Justice.

This appeal involves a conviction for escape. A jury found the appellant guilty and the court assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections but probated the sentence.

Although appellant asserts six grounds of error, his second ground is dispositive of this case. Therein, he contends the court should have granted his motion for instructed verdict because as a matter of law the evidence is insufficient to prove the element of custody.

Our standard of review for a sufficiency of the evidence point is whether, after viewing the evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Burkhalter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Hollomon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Ex parte CarrollCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API