Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roberson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1950No. A-10978Published

1DissentPowell, J.

(dissenting.) I cannot agree with the majority opinion. I feel that there is confusion, and due heretofore in large measure to my inability to clearly derive a proposed exception to a well recognized rule of law. The opinion goes to great length in explaining the recognized rule, with which I find no fault as a general proposition, but does not adequately give consideration to the exception, but summarily condemns it.

This thought is supported by the fact that it was not deemed necessary to set out the facts in the case, and several readings of the opinion fail to reveal the mentioning one…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. FrisbeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Kennamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API