Legal Opinion

Sipp v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1928No. Appeal, 148PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The defendant company executed, on January 6,1911, a policy of insurance for $3,000 on the life of Julia Lynch, in which her daughter Katherine Sipp, the present plaintiff, was named as beneficiary. In the application, the mother stated her age to be fifty, and on this basis the annual premium was fixed. Prior to her death on March 7,1919, she borrowed from the company $423, and this sum was not repaid during lifetime. After the decease of Mrs. Lynch, the beneficiary named made prompt demand for payment of the insurance, and, upon failure of defendant to comply,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Starck v. Union C. L. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Brown v. UngerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Hebb v. Kittanning Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Hall v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Langan v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Messina v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API