Legal Opinion
Rental Housing Owners Ass'n v. City of Hayward
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 2011No. A128168PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JENKINS, J.
Introduction
Following entry of judgment in favor of Rental Housing Owners Association of Southern Alameda County, Inc. (RHOA), on its petition for writ of mandate, the trial court issued a peremptory writ of mandate enjoining the City of Hayward (City) from enforcing the “Mandatory Inspection Program” (MIP) incorporated in its Residential Rental Inspection Ordinance (ordinance). The trial court concluded the ordinance was unconstitutional on its face because it forced landlords to grant City inspectors access to occupied units without the consent of the tenant, in violation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Stennett v. Miller, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Griffith v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.