Legal Opinion

Oddy v. . James

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1872PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action to recover a balance claimed to be due under a verbal contract for work and labor. About the middle of March, 1861, the parties entered into a verbal agreement by which defendant employed plaintiff to superintend his cement works for one year from the first of April then next, for $900. On the 1st of April plaintiff entered upon the employment, took charge of the works and continued his superintendency thereof until August 3d, when he was discharged by defendant.

Read the full summary

Action to recover a balance claimed to be due under a verbal contract for work and labor. About the middle of March, 1861, the parties entered into a verbal agreement by which defendant employed plaintiff to superintend his cement works for one year from the first of April then next, for $900. On the 1st of April plaintiff entered upon the employment, took charge of the works and continued his superintendency thereof until August 3d, when he was discharged by defendant. His services for the remainder of the year were offered and refused, defendant claiming the agreement was void under the…

1Opinion of the Court

Lott, Oh. C., reads for reversal.

All concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trout v. OgilvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Oak Leaf Mill Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Berrien v. SouthackCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
  5. McGirr v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API