Legal Opinion
United States v. Sergio Ramos-Atondo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 2013No. 12-50208, 12-50211, 12-50212, 12-50214PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Sergio Ramos-Atondo, Aberto Corona-Vidal, Jeanearlo Martinez, and Victor Ramos appeal from their convictions for conspiring to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 and importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. 1 Defendants contend that the district court abused its discretion by instructing the jury on a theory of deliberate ignorance. Defendant Ramos contests the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and the district court’s denial of his motion filed under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Sylvia Walter-EzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Lidia RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.