Legal Opinion

Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1940Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Reargument.

Defendants Lisbon Manufacturing Company, Hoskins, Hallett, Long, McCarten, Harry A. Ronan, Piper and Willard have filed a motion for reargument as to certain matters set forth in the opinion, viz:

"Those defendants who were not served with process and appeared specially and filed notice that they appeared for the purpose only of moving to dismiss the action for want of service upon them, have waived the right to file such motion, this not having been done within the- time allowed for dilatory pleadings, Boright v. Williams, 87 Vt. 245, 88 Atl. 735; Wade v. Wade’s Admr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wade v. Wade's Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  2. Boright v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  3. Kenney v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
  4. Murphy v. PuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API