Legal Opinion

Hamburger v. Fry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 1958No. 37964Published

1Opinion

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

Supplemental Opinion on Petition for Rehearing

One of defendants in trial court in his “Petition for Rehearing and Application to Modify Opinion by Plaintiff in Error Arlie Hamburger,” states in effect that this court has by the opinion now extant in this case charged his property with a lien, giving “to the defendant all the advantages of an attachment”, etc. In supplement thereto he argues that we have overlooked 12 O.S. 1957 Supp. § 706.2 (of provision that a judgment debtor may deposit a sufficient amount of cash with the court clerk pending an appeal and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Halliburton v. Illinois Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. H. C. Behrens Lumber Co. v. LagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Caponigri v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Halter v. Spokane Soap Works Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API