Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Conner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1896No. 1,733PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The appellant filed a claim against said *24estate in the Union Circuit Court, founded on a note dated Dec. 21,1882, payable in ten years with interest. The note called for $5,750.00. The venue was changed to the Payette Circuit Court. The defense was that said Rinker did not execute the note and that there ,was no consideration for the note. The jury returned a verdict for appellee, on which judgment was rendered. The only error assigned in this court is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. Counsel for appellant insist that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. ChampionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Merritt v. StrawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Maybin v. WebsterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Haines v. PouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ashwell v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Houk v. BransonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. RomansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Hoover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor v. MetcalfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API