Legal Opinion
Martin v. Derenbecker
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 12, 1906No. 15,853PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Walter Byers Sommerville, Judge. Action by Michael Martin against John Derenbeeker. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Michael Martin and Margaret McMullen Martin, appearing as husband and wife, bring this suit to recover damages for the alleged slander and abuse of the latter by the defendant, and alleges that:
“On October 1, 1904 * * * said John Derenbecker, without any just cause or provocation, did, in this city, and in the presence and hearing of a large number of other persons, defame, slander and abuse the said Mrs. Margaret McMullen Martin, by declaring and stating (here follow the alleged declarations and statements, of which it is sufficient to say that they consist of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Cooper v. CappelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Barton v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Holzab v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
- Dunning v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Levy v. DuclauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Nickens v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gray v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Bianchi v. Del ValleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.