Legal Opinion

William MACH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1998No. 96-16519PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.

William C. Mach (Mach) was convicted in Arizona state court of sexual conduct with a minor under age 14. After the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and the Arizona Supreme Court denied his petition for review, Mach petitioned for habeas corpus in the United States District Court. 1 His petition was denied. On appeal from that denial, Mach contends that he was tried by a biased and tainted jury and that his trial violated due process because the court permitted last-minute introduction of prior bad acts. 2 The district court had jurisdiction…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Osborne ArySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API