Hataishi v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HITCHING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Named plaintiff Dina Hataishi (Plaintiff) appeals from a trial court order denying her motion for certification of a California class of defendant First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation’s (First American) customers whose telephone conversations were recorded without warning. Plaintiff contends that First American’s conduct violates Penal Code 1 section 632, which prohibits the intentional recording of a “confidential communication” without the consent of all parties to the communication. The trial court denied Plaintiff’s motion for class…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Safari Club Int'l v. Lawrence RudolphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Santa Ana Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Santa Ana, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Safari Club Int'l v. Lawrence RudolphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- CS Wang & Assoc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Moen v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.