Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The defendant objected to the introduction of the conversation between the deputy sheriff and the defendant. This evidence is clearly admissible, regardless of whether or not it is a part of the res gestae, because it is a declaration against interest: Or. L., § 727; State v. Zullig, 97 Or. 427, 432, 434 (190 Pac. 580).

The exception to the ruling of the court sustaining an objection to the question: “And never did come into the possession of Mr. Barnes, did it?” propounded on cross-examination to the deputy sheriff is also without merit. The record clearly discloses that the question had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Waite v. GrubbeOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. ZulligOregon Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Application of BoaltOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API