Legal Opinion

Helen Eades, Administratrix of the Estate of Joe Carroll Eades v. Union Railway Company, and Third-Party v. Swift & Company, Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 1968No. 17512_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court that the Union Railway Company is entitled to indemnification by Swift & Company for the damages awarded to Helen Eades in a suit brought by her against the railroad for negligently causing the death of her husband.

Mr. Eades was crushed to death between the Union train and the wall of a Swift feed mill. The clearance between the track and the wall was particularly narrow, and Swift and Union had enter-er into an agreement which provided as follows:

6. Shipper shall not erect or maintain, or allow to be erected or maintained, any building,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kroger Company v. GiemTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Annie J. Brogdon v. Southern Railway Company, Third-Party v. Foote Mineral Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Southern Railway Company v. Foote Mineral Company, Southern Railway Company v. Foote Mineral CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Olin Corporation v. Yeargin IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Elliott Crane Service, Inc. v. H.G. Hill Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Penn Central Corp. v. Checker Cab Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Foster v. Kentucky Housing Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API