Legal Opinion

In re A.K.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 18, 2025No. 127259Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,259 In the Interest of A.K., a Minor Child. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 38-2248(f) gives the court the authority to permit a proffer against an absent party in an evidentiary hearing to terminate parental rights if the party has not instructed counsel to object to proceeding by proffer, but it does not require the court to do so. 2. Under K.S.A. 38-2248(f), a court may not permit a proffer against an absent party at an evidentiary hearing to terminate parental rights if that party instructed their counsel to object. Pursuant to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. LaMarca v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API