Legal Opinion
State v. Hoxsie
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1984No. 14998PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by Gary A. Hoxsie (defendant) from his convictions in Sandoval County District Court of first-degree murder, armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. We affirm.
Defendant argues that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial in the following respects:
1. The prosecutor asked leading questions of the State’s witnesses. The practice was so flagrant that it led the court to admonish the prosecutor.
2. The prosecutor continued after objections and admonitions to ask repetitious questions which called for cumulative responses.
3.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, Attorney General for the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.