Rosello v. Rhea
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The determination has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]). Petitioner admits and the record reflects that her deceased husband, the tenant of record, never received written consent for her to reside in his apartment, and that she was not an authorized occupant of the apartment for a one-year period before his death (Matter of Echeverria v New York City Hous. Auth., 85 AD3d 580, 581 [2011]; Matter of Rivera v New York City Hous. Auth., 60 AD3d 509, 509 [2009]). The record does not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In the Matter of Schorr v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Echeverria v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Filonuk v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rivera v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adler v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Figueroa v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Dancil v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Aponte v. OlatoyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Figueroa v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.