Legal Opinion

Hayden Plan Co. v. Friedlander

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1929No. Docket No. 6476PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding commenced in the superior court asking a review of the action of the Corporation Commissioner in denying plaintiff’s application for a permit to issue securities within the state of California. The court below issued its order directing that the proceedings be brought before it for review, and, after a hearing, the said court made and entered its judgment dismissing the writ of review and affirming the action of defendant Corporation Commissioner. Plaintiff prosecutes the appeal. The record before the court below and the record before us consists of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doble Steam Motors Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hayden Plan Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Daugherty v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. SobieskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Gillis v. Pan American Western Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API