United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought these two actions to compel the defendants to reimburse it for taxes paid to the City of Mobile, Alabama, and to Mobile Gas Service Corporation, in compliance with Section 1, paragraph 193, of the License Code of the City of Mobile, Alabama. Plaintiff contends the reimbursements are due it un*750der alleged contracts entered into with the defendants.
Defendants, after moving for and obtaining orders from this Court for a more definite statement of the complaints, under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960