Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Molda

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 13, 2009No. 1-09-0386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON

delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole issue on this appeal is whether subsection (b) of section 2 — 616 of the Code of Civil Procedure applied to the facts of this case. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 616(b) (West 2006). Subsection (b) is a relation-back statute that permits the addition of certain claims, even after the statute of limitations has expired, if the claims relate back to a timely filed claim. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 616(b) (West 2006). If subsection (b) applied, then plaintiff Nola Wilson would have been able to pursue her suit against defendant Metrolift, Inc., for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Porter v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Roselle Police Pension Board v. Village of RoselleIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horlacher v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. First Chicago Insurance v. MoldaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. First Chicago Insurance Company v. MoldaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Twyman v. The Illinois Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. TalaganovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API