Wilson v. Molda
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON
delivered the opinion of the court:
The sole issue on this appeal is whether subsection (b) of section 2 — 616 of the Code of Civil Procedure applied to the facts of this case. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 616(b) (West 2006). Subsection (b) is a relation-back statute that permits the addition of certain claims, even after the statute of limitations has expired, if the claims relate back to a timely filed claim. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 616(b) (West 2006). If subsection (b) applied, then plaintiff Nola Wilson would have been able to pursue her suit against defendant Metrolift, Inc., for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Porter v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Roselle Police Pension Board v. Village of RoselleIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Horlacher v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- First Chicago Insurance v. MoldaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- First Chicago Insurance Company v. MoldaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Twyman v. The Illinois Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. TalaganovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.