Legal Opinion

Rose v. Allentown Morning Call

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1993No. 1723PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant, James Edward Rose, Jr. [“Rose”], appeals the Honorable James Knoll Gardner’s order which denied Rose’s petition to open a judgment non pros entered against him. Judgment was entered after Rose failed to attend a pre-trial conference. He now claims that judgment should be opened because he did not receive actual notice of the conference. We disagree and affirm.

This is not the first petition to open a non pros judgment that the trial court entertained. In March of 1990, Rose filed a praecipe for writ of summons against the above-captioned defendants/appellees.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Narducci v. Mason's Discount StoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Sklar v. Harleysville InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. DiPasqualeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Abraham Zion Corp. v. After Six, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. Harmony House North 15th Street Housing Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. City of Philadelphia, Water Revenue Bureau v. FrempongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of CiaffoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Fancsali ex rel. Fancsali v. University Health Center of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API