Peterman v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Justice.
The plaintiff, L.L. Peterman, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and William D. Sanford.
Auto-Owners sued Peterman, alleging that pursuant to an indemnity agreement allegedly signed by Peterman, he was individually liable to Auto-Owners for monies Auto-Owners had paid under a bond issued to C & P Construction Company (“C & P”), of which Peterman was the primary shareholder. Auto-Owners, as the surety on the bond, sought $37,634.12 in indemnity because C & P, the principal on the bond, had defaulted on the bond in this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hope v. BrannanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- King v. Winn-Dixie of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Underwood v. Adamson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. Sterne, Agee and Leach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Burns v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000