Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1993No. 1920088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

The plaintiff, L.L. Peterman, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and William D. Sanford.

Auto-Owners sued Peterman, alleging that pursuant to an indemnity agreement allegedly signed by Peterman, he was individually liable to Auto-Owners for monies Auto-Owners had paid under a bond issued to C & P Construction Company (“C & P”), of which Peterman was the primary shareholder. Auto-Owners, as the surety on the bond, sought $37,634.12 in indemnity because C & P, the principal on the bond, had defaulted on the bond in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hope v. BrannanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. King v. Winn-Dixie of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Underwood v. Adamson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Sterne, Agee and Leach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Burns v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API