Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Adamson Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1990No. 89-252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises out of a fraud action filed by Betty J. and Josephus Underwood against Adamson Ford, Inc., and its salesman Mike Baker, who sold them an automobile that the Underwoods say they believed to be new. The defendants moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether they had misrepresented that the automobile was new. The trial court granted the motion and made the judgment final pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P. This appeal followed.

On September 30, 1986, Flora Lawler contacted Mike Baker at Adamson Ford, Inc., in Birmingham, about purchasing an automobile. She…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ivey Corp. v. YatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Soap Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ballew v. Charter Realty ERASupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Peterman v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Sullivan v. Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ballew v. Charter Realty ERASupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API