Legal Opinion

May's Furs & Ready-to-Wear, Inc. v. Bauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, who are respectively a retail dealer in women’s and children’s wearing apparel and the president of a voluntary association, the members of which were employees *644of that dealer, brought this action in equity to procure a judgment in effect permanently enjoining and restraining the defendant, a labor union, and its adherents from committing trespasses against persons and property, as specified in the prayer for relief in the complaint. After a trial of the issues before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendant for such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Remington Rand, Inc. v. CrofootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Busch Jewelry Co. v. United Retail Employees' Union, Local 830New York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Remington Rand, Inc. v. CrofootNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Busch Jewelry Co. v. United Retail EmployeesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API