Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1985No. L.A. 31911PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

This case presents the question whether the State of California may regulate billboards on Indian reservations. Upon examination of the statutes, legislative history, and precedents involved, we conclude that the state’s regulatory authority is preempted by federal law.

This consolidated appeal stems from two separate judgments entered after the trial court granted each plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Both cases, tried separately below, raise substantially the same issues and involve the same defendant. Because resolution of these issues will have a significant effect…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Traverso v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Desert Healthcare District v. Pacificare, FHP, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Alvarado v. Selma Convalescent HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Shamsian v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API