Mountain View Corp. v. Horne
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NOBLE, Justice.
Defendants have appealed from a judgment requiring specific performance of a real estate contract.
Seller (plaintiff) represented itself to be the fee simple owner of the land, free of defects, liens and encumbrances. It agreed to convey when- a specified portion of the purchase price had been paid. At the time of execution of the written contract of sale and purchase, the property was subject to a mortgage and to certain restrictions and easements. The first title policy furnished the escrow agent was subject to those conditions. Purchasers (defendants) defaulted in payment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Porter v. Alamocitos Land & Livestock Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Armijo v. ShambaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. ShepardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rognrud v. ZubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Wyrsch v. MilkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Crumpacker v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Campbell v. KerrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Mountain View Corporation v. HorneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.