Legal Opinion

Mountain View Corp. v. Horne

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1964No. 7481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment requiring specific performance of a real estate contract.

Seller (plaintiff) represented itself to be the fee simple owner of the land, free of defects, liens and encumbrances. It agreed to convey when- a specified portion of the purchase price had been paid. At the time of execution of the written contract of sale and purchase, the property was subject to a mortgage and to certain restrictions and easements. The first title policy furnished the escrow agent was subject to those conditions. Purchasers (defendants) defaulted in payment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Porter v. Alamocitos Land & Livestock Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Armijo v. ShambaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. ShepardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rognrud v. ZubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Wyrsch v. MilkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Crumpacker v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Campbell v. KerrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mountain View Corporation v. HorneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API