Continental Can Co. v. Donahue
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
Appellant contends that because it has become customary, on the part of county auditors in Ohio, to assess real property at a percentage of its true value in money, whereas appellant’s tangible personal property was valued by the Tax Commissioner at its full true value in money, the appellant has been denied its constitutional right of equal protection of the laws required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Appellant contends further that Section 2 of Article XII of the Ohio Constitution requires the use of the same percentage of full “true value in money” in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Zangerle v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moss v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Kroger Co. v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Hodory v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- Okey v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Tiefel v. Gilligan, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.