Legal Opinion
Hodory v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 5, 1976No. C 75-15 YPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, Leonard Paul Hodory (Hodory) filed the above-captioned action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated whose claims for unemployment benefits were denied or will be denied because of the operative effective of a labor dispute disqualification provision in § 4141.29(D)(1)(a) of the Ohio Revised Code.
Hodory challenged the constitutionality of § 4141.29(D)(1)(a) on the grounds that: the provision is in conflict with § 303(a)(1) of the Federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 503(a)(1) and violates the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Police Department of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Williams v. Red Bank Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Williams v. Red Bank Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- New York Telephone Company v. New York State Department Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977