Legal Opinion

Barton v. Kimmerley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1905No. 20,061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom Superior Court of Vigo County; Samuel O. Stimson, Judge. Suit by Elizabeth G-. Barton and others against Katherine Kimmerley. Erom a decree for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This suit was brought by appellants against appellee to quiet title to certain real estate in Vigo county, Indiana, sold under the provisions of an act for the administration of the estates of absentees, being §§2385, 2387-2390 Burns 1901, §§2232-2236 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1901, and §2386 Burns 1901, Acts 1883, p. 209. Appellee filed an answer and cross-complaint to quiet title to said real estate, claiming title thereto by virtue of an administrator’s sale under said act. A trial of said cause resulted in a finding and decree in favor of appellee, quieting her title to said real estate.

*6101.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Cunnius v. Reading School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Cass Farm Co. v. DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Spurgeon v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Dodson v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Mehard v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Beckwith v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API