Legal Opinion
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Plummer
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 21, 1992No. 05-91-00660-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, Justice.
We withdraw our opinion of July 10, 1992, and vacate our judgment of that date. This is now the Court’s opinion.
DART appeals from a declaratory judgment rendered in favor of Chauncey Plum-mer and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1338 (the Union). The trial court upheld an administrative decision reinstating Plummer after his dismissal for shooting a bus passenger. DART attacks the judgment in five points of error. In its first three points of error, DART contends that the trial court erred in finding the Trial Board’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious or in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. SizemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. BrinkmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Texas Education Agency v. LeeperTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Stephens v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- City of Odessa v. BartonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Odessa v. Barton, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.