Legal Opinion

Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2008No. 06-0034PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

Section 13(c) of the federal Urban Mass Transit Act of 1964 (the “UMTA”, now the Federal Transit Act) conditions a public transportation authority’s receipt of federal financial assistance on “arrangements the Secretary of Labor concludes are fair and equitable” to protect “the interests of employees affected by the assistance”. 1 Such arrangements “shall include provisions that may be necessary for ... the preservation of rights, privileges, and benefits ... [and] the protection of individual employees against a worsening of their positions related to employment”. 2

In this case, a public…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Texas Education Agency v. LeeperTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Oncor Electric Delivery Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid TransitTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Texas Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts v. SaitoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Oncor Electric Delivery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Jefferson County v. StinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API